|
7 January 2004
Plame Leak Shameful No Matter How
the White House Spins It
By Josh Marshall
The Hill, 7 January 2004
EXCERPT: With its current battles in the snowy wastes of Iowa and
New Hampshire, the Democratic Party may be, for the moment, a house
divided against itself. But Democrats at least have the consolation
of the Plame investigation, which continues to validate their least
generous suspicions about how the Bush White House operates and
underscore the president’s seeming indifference to recklessness and
law-breaking among high-level members of his own staff.
The S Factor Explains Bush's
Popularity
By Neal Starkman
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: None of the so-called theories can explain President Bush's
popularity, such as it is. Even at this date in his presidency,
after all that has happened, the president's popularity hovers at
around 50 percent -- an astonishingly high figure, I believe, given
the state of people's lives now as opposed to four years ago. What
can explain his popularity? Can that many people be enamored of what
he has accomplished in Iraq? Of how he has fortified our
constitutional freedoms with the USA Patriot Act? Of how he has
bolstered our economy? Of how he has protected our environment?
Perhaps they've been impressed with the president's personal
integrity and the articulation of his grand vision for America? Is
that likely? Granted, there are certain subsections of the American
polity that have substantially benefited from this presidency.
Millionaires and charismatic Christians have accrued either material
or spiritual fortification from Bush's administration. But surely
these two groups are a small minority of the population. What, then,
can account for so many people being so supportive of the president?
The answer, I'm afraid, is the factor that dare not speak its name.
It's the factor that no one talks about. The pollsters don't ask it,
the media don't report it, the voters don't discuss it. I, however,
will blare out its name so that at last people can address the issue
and perhaps adopt strategies to overcome it. It's the "Stupid
factor," the S factor: Some people -- sometimes through no fault of
their own -- are just not very bright.
SEE ALSO:
The Conservative Dean You Don't Know
(TP)
SEE ALSO:
Attacks on Dean Could Prove Harmful to
Democrats (TP)
Two Loud Words About 9/11: Bush
Knew!
By William Rivers Pitt
TruthOut.org, 5 January 2004
EXCERPTS: Two words: 'Bush Knew.' It is, frankly, amazing that this has
fallen down the memory hole. Recall two headlines from that period. The
first, from the UK Guardian on May 19, 2002, was titled 'Bush Knew of
Terrorist Plot to Hijack US Planes.' ... Another story on the topic came
from the New York Times on May 15, 2002, and was titled 'Bush Was Warned bin
Laden Wanted to Hijack Planes.' ... George W. Bush is going to run in 2004
on the idea that his administration is the only one capable of protecting us
from another attack like the ones which took place on September 11. Yet the
record to date is clear. Not only did they fail in spectacular fashion to
deal with those first threats, not only has their reaction caused us to be
less safe, not only have they failed to sufficiently bolster our defenses,
but they used the aftermath of the attacks to ram through policies they
couldn't have dreamed of achieving on September 10. It is one of the most
remarkable turnabouts in American political history: Never before has an
administration used so grisly a personal failure to such excellent effect.
Never mind the final insult: They received all these warnings and went on
vacation for a month down in Texas. The August 6 briefing might as well have
happened in a vacuum. September 11 could have and should have been
prevented. Why? Because Bush knew.
SEE ALSO:
What Bush Knew Before Sept. 11
(CBS)
SEE ALSO:
George W. Bush: Words vs. Deeds
(Intervention)
Bush Grabs New Power for FBI
By Kim Zetter
Wired, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: While the nation was distracted last month by images of Saddam
Hussein's spider hole and dental exam, President George W. Bush quietly
signed into law a new bill that gives the FBI increased surveillance powers
and dramatically expands the reach of the USA Patriot Act.
The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 grants the FBI
unprecedented power to obtain records from financial institutions without
requiring permission from a judge. Under the law, the FBI does not need to
seek a court order to access such records, nor does it need to prove just
cause.
'The Best Recovery Money Can Buy'
By William Keegan
Guardian (UK), 6 January 2004
EXCERPTS: Now you have it. The dollar is in free fall, but it's good for
General Motors and it's good for the US - especially for the Bush
administration during election year. To borrow a phrase from the Nixon
administration of the early 1970s, US policy towards the dollar is one of
benign neglect, benign for the US economy but potentially very malign for
the eurozone.... Is it all too good to be true? Presumably the Democrats
hope so. One possible cloud on the horizon is that falling inflows of
foreign, mainly East Asian funds into the US may force a rise in interest
rates in the run-up to the election. Another is that the oil producing
exporting countries (Opec) may get fed up with the decline in the value of
their dollar earnings and push up the price of oil. That was the trigger
point for the first oil shock of the 1970s). But for the moment George Bush
is riding high on an economic revival that everyone knows means trouble via
the twin budget and trade deficits in the medium term. As for the fiscal
stimulus, more and more commentators are noticing that it is not just tax
cuts that are boosting the US economy but vast increases in military - or,
in the case of lucrative contracts in Iraq, militarily-induced - spending.
That 1950s-style military industrial complex is back.
SEE ALSO:
US Dollar Continues to Slide
(DowJonesWire)
Beef Industry Buys Off the FDA
By the Center for American Progress
TomPaine.com, 6 Januray 2004
EXCERPT: With the scare over mad cow disease escalating, the beef industry
is being forced to accept regulation it has long fought. A story in The New
York Times notes, "the current mad cow crisis reveals how government
regulators sided with companies that adhered to those methods of operation."
That influence is still reaping benefits. USA Today reports that even as a
third cattle herd is quarantined, "the FDA has yet to close loopholes in
mad-cow regulations" that would prevent "the use of cattle remains in animal
feed"‹the very practice that spreads mad cow disease.
SEE ALSO:
Terrorist Potatoes: Unsafe
Food in the U.S. (TP)
Bush Administration Pushes Right Wing School
Voucher Agenda
TomPaine.com, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: While the administration starves its own No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
legislation and disrupts local school districts through non-funded mandates,
voucher advocates are lavished with taxpayer dollars to discredit the very
concept of public education. Bush¹s Education Department, infested with
right-wing ideologues, now serves as headquarters and paymaster for the
public schools¹ fiercest enemies. "Over the past three years, more than $75
million in federal education funding has been diverted to just a handful of
private, pro-voucher advocacy groups," said People for the American Way (PFAW)
in its mid-November report, "Funding a Movement: U.S. Department of
Education Pours Millions into Groups Advocating School Vouchers and
Education Privatization." "This torrent of public funding appears to benefit
and strengthen the advocacy infrastructures created by a network of
right-wing foundations dedicated to the privatization of education." In
plain language, the grants underwrite the salaries and expenses of a growing
cadre of political operatives initially assembled by Republican fat cats in
the late '90s.
EPA Plans to Allow Untreated Sewage
in Waterways
BushGreenWatch.org, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: The public has until Jan. 9 to comment on a Bush Administration
plan to routinely allow sewage that's been only partially treated to be
released into public waterways during storms. The proposal by the
Environmental Protection Agency would exempt sewage treatment plants during
heavy rains and snowmelts from having to put sewage through the standard
biological treatment process to remove pathogenic organisms and other
pollutants. Municipal treatment plants would be allowed to divert sewage
around biological treatment units and then "blend" the largely untreated
sewage with treated wastewater prior to discharge.
SEE ALSO:
EPA Planst to Loosen Mountaintop Removal Rules
(BGW)
Guess Which Jobs Are Going Abroad:
Tax Accountants
CNN/Money, 5 January 2004
If a tax preparer gets you an unexpected refund this year, you may have an
accountant in India to thank. That's because accounting firms are joining
the outsourcing trend established years ago by cost-conscious American
manufacturers. In fact, companies in a number of unexpected industries are
now sending work overseas. From scientific lab analysis to medical billing,
the service-sector workforce has gone global. CPA firms are just one
example. In the 2002 tax year, accounting firms sent some 25,000 tax returns
to be completed by accountants in India. This year, that number is expected
to quadruple. The reason lies in the numbers; accountants in the United
States typically earn $4,000 a month. In places like India it's closer to
$400, says David Wyle, CEO and founder of SurePrep, a tax-outsourcing firm
based in southern California that's employed more than 200 accountants in
Bombay and Ahmedabad, India. "We've estimated firms will save between
$40,000 to $50,000 for every 100 returns that are outsourced," adds Wyle,
whose firm expects to do 35,000 returns in the coming year. That's up from
7,000 last year.
6 January 2004
Some Facts About the
Economy
FACT: "More than 2.2 million jobs have been lost
since Bush took office. Bush is still on pace to be the first
President since Herbert Hoover to have a net job loss over his
four year term." - BLS Data
FACT: In July 2003, the Counsel of Economic Advisors predicted
that the President's latest round of tax cuts would produce
1,530,000 jobs would be created in the first five months. In
fact, only 271,000 jobs were created over those five months for
a cumulative shortfall of 1,259,000 jobs. - Economic Policy
Institute
FACT: "New jobs created during the 2004-05 period are forecast
to pay an average of $35,855, far lower than the $43,629 average
pay of those jobs lost between 2001-03." - U.S. Conference of
Mayors, 11/10/03
FACT: Poverty levels have risen for the second straight year in
a row - the first time in more than 13 years. -
Economic Policy Institute -- Ed Epping
Provided by the
Texas Fair Trade Coalition Newsletter, 5 January 2004 |
VIDEO
LINK
View the 'Bush in 30 Seconds' TV Ad Contest Finalists
BushIn30Seconds.org
Here you'll find fifteen superb thirty-second commercials designed to bring
the case against Bush to television viewers around the country. As the site
says, "The winning commercial will be announced at an event on January 12th
at the Hammerstein Ballroom in New York City. You can buy tickets online
now. The finalists are also being sent out to our panel of celebrity judges
which includes Michael Moore, Donna Brazile, Jack Black, Janeane Garofalo,
Margaret Cho and Gus Van Sant. These judges will determine which ad wins the
contest overall." Fantastic viewing! Share the link.
Quarantining Dissent
How the Secret Service protects Bush from free speech
James Bovard
San Francisco Chronicle, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: When President Bush travels around the United States, the Secret
Service visits the location ahead of time and orders local police to set up
"free speech zones" or "protest zones," where people opposed to Bush
policies (and sometimes sign-carrying supporters) are quarantined. These
zones routinely succeed in keeping protesters out of presidential sight and
outside the view of media covering the event. ...On May 30, 2002, Ashcroft
effectively abolished restrictions on FBI surveillance of Americans'
everyday lives first imposed in 1976. One FBI internal newsletter encouraged
FBI agents to conduct more interviews with antiwar activists "for plenty of
reasons, chief of which it will enhance the paranoia endemic in such circles
and will further service to get the point across that there is an FBI agent
behind every mailbox." The FBI took a shotgun approach toward protesters
partly because of the FBI's "belief that dissident speech and association
should be prevented because they were incipient steps toward the possible
ultimate commission of act which might be criminal," according to a Senate
report. On Nov. 23 news broke that the FBI is actively conducting
surveillance of antiwar demonstrators, supposedly to "blunt potential
violence by extremist elements," according to a Reuters interview with a
federal law enforcement official. Given the FBI's expansive definition of
"potential violence" in the past, this is a net that could catch almost any
group or individual who falls into official disfavor.
White House Seeks Secrecy on Detainee
By GINA HOLLAND Associated Press Writer
AP in FindLaw.com, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: In an extraordinary request, the Bush administration asked the
Supreme Court on Monday to let it keep its arguments secret in a case
involving an immigrant's challenge of his treatment after the Sept. 11
terror attacks. Mohamed Kamel Bellahouel wants the high court to consider
whether the government acted improperly by secretly jailing him after the
attacks and keeping his court fight private. He is supported by more than 20
journalism organizations and media companies. Solicitor General Theodore
Olson told justices in a one-paragraph filing that "this matter pertains to
information that is required to be kept under seal." Justices sometimes are
asked to keep parts of cases private because of information sensitive for
national security or other reasons, but it's unusual for an entire filing to
be kept secret. Lucy A. Dalglish, executive director of The Reporters
Committee for Freedom of the Press, said she was disappointed by the
government's request. "The idea that there is nothing that could be filed
publicly is really ridiculous," she said. "It just emphasizes our point that
we're living in frightening times. People can be arrested, thrown in jail
and have secret court proceedings, and we know absolutely nothing about it."
The court will decide later whether to consider Bellahouel's appeal and at
the same time whether to allow the secret filing. Justices will be able to
review the government's private arguments.
Time to Take Rights Seriously
by Judd Legum
Center for American Progress, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Padilla decision was more than just a political victory
for civil libertarians; it was a firm rejection of the Bush
administration’s cavalier approach to fundamental substantive and
procedural legal protections. The 2nd Circuit’s decision, which
requires Padilla to be released from military custody within 30
days, placed considerable emphasis on the Non-Detention Act of 1971.
In so doing, the court provided a historical context for its ruling
that demands closer examination. ...Rather than fighting the ruling,
the administration should use the decision as an opportunity to
reassess its legal approach to combating terrorism. We need fair,
humane and articulate standards that govern the treatment, not just
of Padilla and other citizens but also of the hundreds of
noncitizens detained as “enemy combatants” in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
Such procedures should be consistent with constitutional and
statutory law and recognize the vital role of the independent
judiciary in the process. After all, the purpose of rolling back the
terrorist threat is to preserve our freedoms. If, in the process, we
undermine the legal principles that are the source our freedoms,
then what, exactly, are we fighting for?
SEE ALSO:
Court Looks at More Terror Plan Challenges
(AP in FindLaw.com)
U.S. Offers Tips for Business to
Avoid OT Pay
By LEIGH STROPE
AP, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Labor Department is giving employers tips on how to
avoid paying overtime to some of the 1.3 million low-income workers
who would become eligible under new rules expected to be finalized
early this year. The department's advice comes even as it touts the
$895 million in increased wages that it says those workers would be
guaranteed from the reforms, which Labor Secretary Elaine Chao
called long overdue. ...A final rule, revising the 1938 Fair Labor
Standards Act, is expected to be issued in March. The act defines
the types of jobs that qualify workers for time-and-a-half if they
work more than 40 hours a week. Overtime pay for the 1.3 million
low-income workers has been a selling tool for the Bush
administration in trying to ease concerns in Congress about millions
of higher-paid workers becoming ineligible. But the Labor
Department, in a summary of its plan published last March, suggests
how employers can avoid paying overtime to those newly eligible
low-income workers.
Why Retirement Plans are Falling
Short
By David R. Francis
AP in CS Monitor (FindLaw.com), 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: By now, it is no secret: Many American workers don't save
adequately for retirement. And in most cases, the ever-popular
401(k) plans offered by private businesses will not make up for the
inadequacy of a Social Security pension. In short, 401(k)s are
failing many workers, especially younger ones - not because these
plans are themselves inadequate, but because Americans are not
taking full advantage of them. Consider:
* In 2000, half of working families (51 percent) did not own a
private retirement savings account - no 401(k), no 403(b) offered by
nonprofits, no Individual Retirement Account, and no Keogh account
for the self-employed.
* A quarter of eligible workers do not join such plans, in effect
giving up free money their employers would contribute.
* When changing jobs, nearly 60 percent of 401(k) participants cash
out their accounts rather than leave it in the plan for retirement
use. Such moves incur heavy tax penalties. These behaviors fall
disproportionately on younger workers. Older people about to retire
with a standard corporate pension are "pretty much OK," says Alicia
Munnell, director of Boston College's Center for Retirement Research
and coauthor of a new book, "Coming Up Short; The Challenges of
401(k) Plans." But baby boomers and younger workers may be "ill-
prepared," she adds. Most workers in the United States - 96 percent
- are covered by Social Security. But the average retired worker
gets $900 a month, a spouse half of that. It is hardly lavish.
U.S. to Destroy 450 Calves in Mad
Cow Probe
By Randy Fabi
Reuters, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: The month-old offspring of a Washington state dairy cow
infected with mad cow disease will be destroyed along with about 450
other calves as a safety precaution, the U.S. Agriculture Department
said on Monday. ...The planned slaughter leaves at least 4,000 other
cattle linked to the mad cow investigation still under quarantine.
Progressivism in 2004:
Transcending the Liberal-Conservative Divide
by John Halpin
Center for American Progress, 5 Januar 2004
EXCERPT: ...progressivism points the way beyond the
liberal-conservative divisions that are sure to occupy much of the
public debate in 2004, to a politics grounded on reasonable action
and ethical principles of what constitutes a good society and a
strong America. Progressive political thought provides a blueprint
for effective and publicly accepted solutions to major problems. In
this framework, government should neither be feared nor favored, but
made to be an effective force for good and opportunities for all
Americans. Individuals must behave responsibly and take their role
as citizens seriously. And ideologies of any stripe should be
discarded in favor of the core American values that help lead us to
the most sensible solutions to the challenges ahead.
5 January 2004
Mercurial
Policy
Baltimore Sun, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Bush administration decided to slow down the timetable
for requiring power plants to install pollution controls aimed
specifically at mercury. As a result, a targeted 90 percent
reduction in mercury emissions, which the Clinton administration
estimated could be reached by 2008, would be replaced by a reduction
target of 70 percent with a deadline of 2018. What's more, the
Environmental Protection Agency under Mr. Bush's direction proposed
to downgrade the classification of mercury from "hazardous air
pollutant" to a less stringent category so it can be part of a
program that allows companies to buy pollution "credits" from
cleaner plants. Of course, the difference in approach between
thermometers and power plants isn't hard to figure out. Most of the
mercury thermometers are made these days in China and India. They
don't have a big lobby here. Utilities, meanwhile, have repeatedly
been awarded special consideration by the Bush administration, which
is being sued by Maryland and most of the other states in the
Northeastern U.S. for relaxing other Clean Air Act requirements on
those plants.
So, Is Orange the New Color
of Safety?
By Ellen Goodman
Boston Globe, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Can we rerun the videotape back to Dec. 15 when Howard Dean
qualified his pleasure at the capture of Saddam Hussein by saying
that it "has not made America safer"? Dean was instantly lambasted
by his opponents, especially Joe Lieberman, who said the doctor was
climbing "into his own spider hole of denial." Well, six days later,
after the sort of terrorist "chatter" designed to make your teeth
chatter, the country was put on orange alert for a "spectacular"
attack rivaling 9/11. Then six Air France flights destined to fly
into the homeland were grounded. And finally, under "emergency
rules," our government has required armed guards on foreign flights.
Are we safer yet?
House Democrats Lose One to
Republicans
AP, 3 January 2004
EXCERPT: Texas Rep. Ralph M. Hall switched parties Friday night,
filing for reelection as a Republican after 23 years as one of the
most conservative Democrats in Congress. "I've always said that if
being a Democrat hurt my district, I would switch or I would
resign," Hall said in an interview. He said GOP leaders had recently
refused to place money for his district in a spending bill and "the
only reason I was given was I was a Democrat." In an interview in
which he said he had filed to run as a Republican, he also said he
didn't agree with "all these guys running against the president."
Willie Nelson Sings for
Peace and Dennis Kucinich
By John Nichols
The Nation, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Dennis Kucinich still faces an uphill climb in his campaign
to win the Democratic presidential nomination. But his anti-Iraq war
candidacy has already inspired better music than those of contenders
who are garnering far more attention and campaign money. The New
Year's weekend benefit for Kucinich at the Austin Music Hall was one
of the finest campaign concerts in recent memory, and the sentiments
of the stellar cast of performers was well summed up by singer
Bonnie Raitt, who introduced a bluesy version of the Buffalo
Springfield hit "For What It's Worth," be declaring, "Here's to free
speech. Here's to fair elections. Here's to the possibility that
Dennis Kucinich could win."... The highlight of the Saturday night
show came when Kucinich's most high-profile musician backer, Willie
Nelson, took the stage. Nelson, who has been talking up Kucinich's
candidacy since last summer, says he was attracted to Kucinich first
because of the Ohio congressman's passionate defense of family
farmers -- a cause close to the heart of the country singer, who has
been a core backer of the Farm Aid concerts. But, as he campaigned
for Kucinich over the weekend, Nelson picked up on the anti-war
message that has been central to Kucinich's run for the White House.
3-4 January 2004
Bush's Budget for 2005 Seeks to
Rein In Domestic Costs
By ROBERT PEAR
New York Times, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Facing a record budget deficit, Bush administration
officials say they have drafted an election-year budget that will
rein in the growth of domestic spending... (This action is being
taken even though)...military and domestic security spending in the
last two years dwarfed the increase in domestic discretionary
programs, which did not quite keep pace with inflation. "The
increases for defense, international affairs and homeland security
have been much greater — and thus have played a much larger role in
the return to deficits — than the increases for domestic
appropriations."
Flight Groundings Lead Allies to
Query Washington
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: British Airways canceled another flight to the United
States on Friday as the Bush administration faced questions from
American allies about the reliability of the intelligence
information that has led to the recent rash of flight cancellations.
...Administration officials said no arrests had been made in
connection with any of the more than a dozen international flights
subjected to rigorous scrutiny. And officials have acknowledged that
even now, they are uncertain whether they have succeeded in foiling
a terrorist plot. "I don't think we know yet, and we may never
know," a senior administration official said. ...But there appear to
be limits to how far other nations will go to accommodate American
concerns.
Bush Aims to Dodge Tough
Poll Issues
By Lawrence Donegan
Guardian (UK), 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: There may be a conflict raging in Iraq that is killing US
soldiers on a daily basis. There may be the threat of an economic
crisis, too much unemployment and political debate infused with
vitriol levels unseen for years. Yet President George W Bush is
planning to win re-election by turning reality on its head. Bush is
drawing up a positive, soft-focus and upbeat campaigning platform
portraying him as the candidate of national unity.
SEE ALSO:
Dean Surges Upward in Harris Poll, Against
Bush
Dean Cites Terror Alert as
Vindication
By Holly Ramer
AP, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean on Friday cited
the higher terror alert and the number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq
in arguing that he was right to say Saddam Hussein's capture didn't
make America safer. "They got all excited, but here we are," Dean
told a town-hall meeting. "We've lost 10 more troops and F-16s are
escorting foreign passenger jets into our air space because we're
now more worried than we were before."
Most of the World Thinks Bush Sucks. Why
Don't We?
Patricia Ernest
(Pissed
Off Patricia's Blog )
OpEdNews.com,
January 2004
EXCERPT: Dr. Dean was absolutely correct. We are no safer now than
we were last February. Wanna know why? Well, it's because we have
made some newer bigger enemies and we seem to be adding to the list
almost every day. Yes, apparently Saddam is in custody, but I
wasn't afraid of him when he was running lose so why would I feel
more secure now that he's in jail. His neighbors may feel better,
but I don't remember hearing them say that. To tell you the truth, I
believe that there are a lot more dangerous people in this world
than Saddam. Some maybe not even that far away.
The Law of War in the War on
Terror
Kenneth Roth, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
From Foreign Affairs, January/February 2004
Summary: The Bush administration has literalized its "war" on
terrorism, dissolving the legal boundaries between what a government
can do in peacetime and what's allowed in war. This move may have
made it easier for Washington to detain or kill suspects, but it has
also threatened basic due process rights, thereby endangering us
all.
Republican Fundraising in Texas is Target of
Probe
By Scott Gold
LA Times, 3 January 2004
EXCERPT: Authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into
whether corporate money, including hundreds of thousands of dollars
linked to U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, improperly financed
the Republican Party's takeover of the Texas Capitol. The probe is
focused on several political and fundraising organizations run by
Republican activists, investigators said. One of the organizations,
the political action committee Texans for a Republican Majority, has
direct ties to DeLay, a Texas Republican and one of the most
powerful politicians in Washington. At issue is whether the
organizations improperly used corporate contributions to help
finance the campaigns of more than 20 Republican candidates for the
Texas House of Representatives in 2002, according to documents and
interviews with prosecutors and government investigators.
Pat Robertson Predicts Bush
in 2004 Blowout
Associated Press, 2 January 2004
EXCERPTS: Pat Robertson said Friday that God told him President Bush
will be re-elected in a landslide. "I think George Bush is going to
win in a walk,'' the religious broadcaster said on his "700 Club''
program on the Virginia Beach-based Christian Broadcasting Network,
which he founded.... The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, a frequent Robertson
critic and executive director of Americans United for Separation of
Church and State, said he had a prediction of his own. "I predict
that Pat Robertson in 2004 will continue to use his multimillion
broadcasting empire to promote George Bush and other Republican
candidates,'' Lynn said in a statement. "Maybe Pat got a message
from (Bush political adviser) Karl Rove and thought it was from
God.''
Justice Could Decide Leak Was Not
a Crime
By Mike Allen
Washington Post, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Justice Department investigation into the leak of
a CIA agent's identity could conclude that administration officials
disclosed the woman's name and occupation to the media but still
committed no crime because they did not know she was an undercover
operative, legal experts said this week. "It could be embarrassing
but not illegal," said Victoria Toensing, who was chief counsel of
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence when Congress passed the
law protecting the identities of undercover agents.
SEE ALSO:
Another Perspective On This Article
(TPM)
SEE ALSO:
And More
(TPM)
The Cow
Jumped Over the U.S.D.A.
By ERIC SCHLOSSER
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Agriculture Department has a dual, often contradictory
mandate: to promote the sale of meat on behalf of American producers
and to guarantee that American meat is safe on behalf of consumers.
For too long the emphasis has been on commerce, at the expense of
safety. The safeguards against mad cow that Ms. Veneman announced on
Tuesday — including the elimination of "downer cattle" (cows that
cannot walk) from the food chain, the removal of high-risk material
like spinal cords from meat processing, the promise to introduce a
system to trace cattle back to the ranch — have long been demanded
by consumer groups. Their belated introduction seems to have been
largely motivated by the desire to have foreign countries lift
restrictions on American beef imports. Worse, on Wednesday Ms.
Veneman ruled out the the most important step to protect Americans
from mad cow disease: a large-scale program to test the nation's
cattle for bovine spongiform encephalopathy. The beef industry has
fought for nearly two decades against government testing for any
dangerous pathogens, and it isn't hard to guess why: when there is
no true grasp of how far and wide a food-borne pathogen has spread,
there's no obligation to bear the cost of dealing with it.
Slaughterhouse Politics:
Ranchers Fought Rules That Might Have Prevented Mad Cow
by James Ridgeway
Village Voice, 31 December 2003 - January 6, 2004
EXCERPT: When it comes to politics you just can't beat the cattlemen
for bellyaching. They are forever running around Washington, wanting
to pay lower fees for overgrazing the public range or demanding
cutbacks in environmental laws that might actually slightly intrude
on their operations, and like everyone else under the big Republican
tent, babbling on about the wonders of the "free market."
Bush Aims to Dodge Tough
Poll Issues
By Lawrence Donegan
Guardian (UK), 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: There may be a conflict raging in Iraq that is killing US
soldiers on a daily basis. There may be the threat of an economic
crisis, too much unemployment and political debate infused with
vitriol levels unseen for years. Yet President George W Bush is
planning to win re-election by turning reality on its head. Bush is
drawing up a positive, soft-focus and upbeat campaigning platform
portraying him as the candidate of national unity.
SEE ALSO:
Dean Surges Upward in Harris Poll, Against
Bush
Dean Cites Terror Alert as
Vindication
By Holly Ramer
AP, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean on Friday cited
the higher terror alert and the number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq
in arguing that he was right to say Saddam Hussein's capture didn't
make America safer. "They got all excited, but here we are," Dean
told a town-hall meeting. "We've lost 10 more troops and F-16s are
escorting foreign passenger jets into our air space because we're
now more worried than we were before."
The Law of War in the War on
Terror
Kenneth Roth, Executive Director of Human Rights Watch
From Foreign Affairs, January/February 2004
Summary: The Bush administration has literalized its "war" on
terrorism, dissolving the legal boundaries between what a government
can do in peacetime and what's allowed in war. This move may have
made it easier for Washington to detain or kill suspects, but it has
also threatened basic due process rights, thereby endangering us
all.
Republican Fundraising in Texas is Target of
Probe
By Scott Gold
LA Times, 3 January 2004
EXCERPT: Authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into
whether corporate money, including hundreds of thousands of dollars
linked to U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, improperly financed
the Republican Party's takeover of the Texas Capitol. The probe is
focused on several political and fundraising organizations run by
Republican activists, investigators said. One of the organizations,
the political action committee Texans for a Republican Majority, has
direct ties to DeLay, a Texas Republican and one of the most
powerful politicians in Washington. At issue is whether the
organizations improperly used corporate contributions to help
finance the campaigns of more than 20 Republican candidates for the
Texas House of Representatives in 2002, according to documents and
interviews with prosecutors and government investigators.
Pat Robertson Predicts Bush
in 2004 Blowout
Associated Press, 2 January 2004
EXCERPTS: Pat Robertson said Friday that God told him President Bush
will be re-elected in a landslide. "I think George Bush is going to
win in a walk,'' the religious broadcaster said on his "700 Club''
program on the Virginia Beach-based Christian Broadcasting Network,
which he founded.... The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, a frequent Robertson
critic and executive director of Americans United for Separation of
Church and State, said he had a prediction of his own. "I predict
that Pat Robertson in 2004 will continue to use his multimillion
broadcasting empire to promote George Bush and other Republican
candidates,'' Lynn said in a statement. "Maybe Pat got a message
from (Bush political adviser) Karl Rove and thought it was from
God.''
Justice Could Decide Leak Was Not
a Crime
By Mike Allen
Washington Post, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Justice Department investigation into the leak of
a CIA agent's identity could conclude that administration officials
disclosed the woman's name and occupation to the media but still
committed no crime because they did not know she was an undercover
operative, legal experts said this week. "It could be embarrassing
but not illegal," said Victoria Toensing, who was chief counsel of
the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence when Congress passed the
law protecting the identities of undercover agents.
SEE ALSO:
Another Perspective On This Article
(TPM)
SEE ALSO:
And More
(TPM)
Slaughterhouse Politics:
Ranchers Fought Rules That Might Have Prevented Mad Cow
by James Ridgeway
Village Voice, 31 December 2003 - January 6, 2004
EXCERPT: When it comes to politics you just can't beat the cattlemen
for bellyaching. They are forever running around Washington, wanting
to pay lower fees for overgrazing the public range or demanding
cutbacks in environmental laws that might actually slightly intrude
on their operations, and like everyone else under the big Republican
tent, babbling on about the wonders of the "free market."
2 January 2004
Some School Districts Challenge
Bush's Signature Education Law
By SAM DILLON
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: A small but growing number of school systems around the
country are beginning to resist the demands of President Bush's
signature education law, saying its efforts to raise student
achievement are too costly and too cumbersome. The school district
here in Reading recently filed suit contending that Pennsylvania, in
enforcing the federal law, had unfairly judged Reading's efforts to
educate thousands of recent immigrants and unreasonably required the
impoverished city to offer tutoring and other services for which
there is no money. ...The law, known as No Child Left Behind and
signed in January 2002, seeks to raise achievement by penalizing
schools where test scores do not meet annual targets. It is the most
sweeping plan to shake up public education in a generation, as well
as the most intrusive federal intervention in local schools. But
until recently it had provoked little more than grumbling, though
polls showed that educators in most of the nation's 15,000 districts
considered several of its requirements ill-conceived.
Scent of Sleaze Persists
Amid US Boom
By David Teather
Guardian (UK), 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: Wall Street and the rest of corporate America did little
during 2003 to repair the squalid image which took shape the
previous year. But despite a new crop of scandals to keep federal
prosecutors busy, there were no new Enrons, the energy company which
was once the seventh largest business in the US and collapsed amid
accounting fraud. Confidence returned to both the markets and the
economy by year-end.... Whether the boom, fuelled by tax cuts and
government spending lasts in 2004 is less certain. The dollar
suffered a terrible year, largely due to the trading and federal
budgetary deficits which fuelled GDP growth. In July 2001, one euro
bought less than 84 cents. It now buys more than $1.20.
The Budget Politics of Being
Poor
New York Times, 31 December 2003
EXCERPT: Quietly and painfully, most states are choosing to
crimp the health-care safety net for their poorest and most
politically defenseless residents. An ominous new study shows that
up to 1.6 million impoverished and working-poor Americans — at least
a third of them children — have been deliberately knocked from
publicly financed health care programs in the last two years.
Officials in 34 states are opting to slash Medicaid and poor
children's health insurance coverage as a path of least resistance
to the balanced budgets mandated by law.
Progress Report 2004: The
Road Ahead
Center for American Progress, 30
December 2003
David Sirota, Christy Harvey and Judd Legum take a look at what the
new year may have in store for America in such areas as National
Security, the economy and domestic policy.
And the Corporateer of the
Year Is...
Lessons and victories in the fight
against corporate corruption
Common Dreams, 31 December 2003
EXCERPT: The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights (FTCR)
today released its top 10 list of corporateering in 2003. The
ranking tracks the worst instances of big industries putting their
commercial gain above the interests of individuals and society. FTCR
also announced the top five counter-corporateering advances. "The
notion that the free market is more important than the free society
was pushed to new heights during 2003," said FTCR president Jamie
Court, who coined the term corporateering in his 2003 book
Corporateering: How Corporate Power Steals Your Personal Freedom And
What You Can Do About It (Tarcher/Putnam). "When the market is
treated as more important than society, then individuals become
shareholders in America rather than citizens with inalienable
rights. At the same time, the counter- corporateering movement had a
handful key victories this year that could set a new tone in 2004."
SEE ALSO:
Death Penalty for Corporations that Defraud
Government? (CD)
Who's Nader Now?
By Paul Krugman
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The irony is that by seeking to undermine the election
prospects of a man who may well be their party's nominee, Mr.
Lieberman and Mr. Kerry have reminded us of why their once-promising
campaigns imploded. Most Democrats feel, with justification, that
we're facing a national crisis ‹ that the right, ruthlessly
exploiting 9/11, is making a grab for total political dominance. The
party's rank and file want a candidate who is running, as the Dean
slogan puts it, to take our country back. This is no time for a
candidate who is running just because he thinks he deserves to be
president.
Who Wrote Bush's Love Poem,
and Why Lie About It?
By Matt Bivens
The Nation, 1 January 2003
EXCERPT: Now that you know Bush didn't write it, look at the poem
again. Can't you just hear some crapulous Republican operative in a
rumpled suit croaking instructions? "Make sure you get their damned
mutt Barney into it, those soccer dames love the dogs. But if
there's gonna be a dog, you gotta mention the cat! Everybody knows
that, kid! Put in some vague bedroom imagery -- somethin' about the
bed. Nothing too explicit! And, uh, get in a slap at the French --
that French-bashing stuff is really going over well. Something about
how they're so prissy, kissin' hands and all ..." So who wrote
George Bush's love poem to Laura Bush? I suspect we'll just have to
add it to all of the other mysteries -- like who lied in George
Bush's State of the Union speech, and who had manual-labor-like
relations with that doggoned "Mission Accomplished" banner, and
which jerk at the White House unmasked a CIA agent to punish her
husband, and why lie to Ground Zero rescue and cleanup workers, and
how the President's brother got all that free sex and money when
visiting Asia...
Challenging Bush:
Past Defeat and Personal Quest Shape Long-Shot
Kucinich Bid
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
New York Times, 1 January 2004
After Halting Start, Clark Seems
to Be Finding Legs
By EDWARD WYATT
New York Times, 2 January 2004
Gephardt Says Bush 'Worries Me'
By Dan Balz
Washington Post, 1 January 2004
EXCERPT: Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo.) said yesterday that
President Bush lacks an understanding of the complexities of
national security policy and has displayed a cowboy mentality toward
the rest of the world that threatens to leave the country less
secure against terrorist and other threats. ...Gephardt said that,
based on his meetings with Bush, he does not trust the president to
conduct foreign policy. "He's not dumb," he said, "but he is not
informed and he's not experienced and he hasn't surrounded himself
with the right people to give him the information and the experience
that he doesn't have. And he worries me."
1 January 2004
Don't Be Fooled: No Independent
Counsel for CIA Leak
By Ray McGovern
TomPaine.com, 31 December 2003
EXCERPT: It seems it is all too easy to get caught up in the holiday
spirit. How else to explain the reaction of the normally astute Sen.
Charles Schumer (D-NY)to the news that Attorney General Ashcroft has
finally done what The New York Times lauds as "the right thing."
Schumer is quoted in today¹s Times as seeing the glass
"three-quarters full" in light of Ashcroft¹s decisions regarding the
Valerie Plame case. Ashcroft announced he will recuse himself from
the investigation of the deliberate blowing of the cover of CIA
official Valerie Plame, and appointed U.S. Attorney Patrick
Fitzgerald as "special counsel" to investigate that felony. Howard
Dean labeled the maneuver "too little, too late." I fear Dean is
right. Even the Times, in its "Right Thing" editorial, notes that
"there are still serious questions about the investigation," namely,
whether Fitzgerald will have "true operational independence." The
odds are strongly against it. Yesterday¹s maneuver should not
obscure the fact that in naming Fitzgerald, who remains under the
authority of Ashcroft¹s deputy, the Bush administration has rejected
the only appropriate course‹naming a complete outsider to be special
counsel.
(Other links inadvertently deleted.)
See previously selected articles in our
archives.
|
7 January 2004
AUDIO/VIDEO LINK
Cheney Facing Prosecution In France
For Halliburton Gas Deal In Nigeria
An interview with The Nation's Doug Ireland
Democracy Now!, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: A French prosecutor is examining whether to prosecute Vice
President Dick Cheney over suspected complicity in the abuse of
corporate assets dating from the time he was head of the services
company Halliburton. The case stems from a contract by a consortium
including the American company Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR), a
Halliburton subsidiary, and a French company, Technip, to supply a
gas complex to Nigeria. Since October, a Paris magistrate has been
investigating complaints that $180 million was paid in secret
commissions from the late 1990s to 2002 from funds established by
the consortium. Cheney was Halliburton's chief executive from 1995
to 2000. In a letter to the attorney general's department,
magistrate Reynaud van Ruymbeke ruled out directly prosecuting
Cheney on a charge of bribing foreign officials but he did not
exclude prosecution on the grounds of complicity in the misuse of
corporate assets.
SEE ALSO:
Will the French Indict Cheney?
(The Nation)
SEE ALSO:
Surprise! Army Clears Halliburton of
Overbilling
(Reuters)
Army Prevents Troops from
Leaving
New York Times, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Army is preparing an order that would require about
7,000 troops now in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan to remain on duty
through the end of their deployments this spring, even if they could
otherwise leave the service before then, an Army personnel officer
said Monday. Once these troops return to their bases, they may also
be required to remain in the service for up to 90 days while they
complete their formal separation from the Army, said the personnel
officer, Col. Elton R. Manske. Another order, previously announced,
already prevents active-duty and reserve troops rotating into Iraq
and Kuwait this year from leaving the Army before serving 12 months
on the ground, plus a similar 90-day period after they return.
SEE ALSO:
Kucinich Calls Refusal to Discharge an
'Involuntary Draft'
Bush: Intoxicated With Power
By Ray McGovern
TomPaine.com, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: It came at the very end of a long New York Times report of
Jan. 2 regarding the havoc caused at Dulles airport in Washington,
D.C. because of heightened concern there of a terrorist attack. "In
a footnote, the director of security at Dulles airport was arrested
Thursday on suspicion of drunk driving." Dulles airport's director
of security, former Secret Service agent Charles Brady, was pulled
over on suspicion of being drunk at the wheel at the very height of
the emergency! What a telling metaphor for malfeasance at a more
senior level, I thought to myself. While President George W. Bush
may no longer be drinking, the year 2003 showed him to be DWI in a
far more dangerous sense-driving while intoxicated with power. Worse
still, unlike Brady and other drivers for whom the police provide
disincentive to full-speed-ahead, the president sees no reason to
apply the brakes--surrounded as he is with swift SUVs and with
televangelist Pat Robertson riding shotgun. The top story of 2003,
in my view, deals with official malfeasance, the difference between
Brady and Bush, and the reasons why the latter has not yet been
pulled over for reckless endangerment on an international scale.
Neocons Urge War With
France, Korea, Syria and Iran
By Doug Ireland
TomPaine.com, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: It's a helluva New Year's present: a new neocon manifesto
which wants to put the United States on a course for war with three
countries. Published the day before 2004 by Random House, An End to
Evil: How to Win the War on Terror bears the signature of two of
Washington's most influential ideologues. Richard Perle, known as
the "Prince of Darkness", helped put together the now-famous 1999
neocon manifesto (signed by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, among
others) calling for war on Iraq. David Frum is Dubya¹s former
speechwriter, the man who coined "axis of evil" and put it in the
president's mouth. The book proposes harsh action against
France‹which Perle and Frum say should be treated as an "enemy"‹and
thunders that "We should force European governments to choose
between Paris and Washington."
Israel Joins US in Training
Foreign Armies
By Amos Harel
Haaretz, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: The IDF is offering foreign armed forces training sessions
in the training center for field units in the Ze'elim base. The move
is intended to improve the relations with friendly states' armies as
well as bring income into the IDF's empty coffers.
SEE ALSO:
Israel Makes 'Water for Arms' Deal with Turkey
(Guardian)
SEE ALSO:
Syria Given Weapons Ultimatum
(Telegraph, UK)
SEE ALSO:
Israeli Troops Kill Palestinian Teenager
(AFP)
Military Split on Use of
Special Forces
By Gregory L. Vistica
Washington Post, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: With Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld pressuring the
Pentagon to take a more aggressive role in tracking down terrorists,
military and intelligence officials are engaged in a fierce debate
over when and how elite military units should be deployed for
maximum effectiveness. Under Rumsfeld's direction, secret commando
units known as hunter-killer teams have been ordered to "kick down
the doors," as the generals put it, all over the world in search of
al Qaeda members and their sympathizers. The approach has succeeded
in recent months in Iraq, as Special Operations forces have helped
capture Saddam Hussein and other Baathist loyalists. But in other
parts of the world, particularly Afghanistan, these soldiers and
their civilian advocates have complained to superiors that the
Pentagon's counterterrorism policy is too inflexible in the use of
Special Forces overall and about what units are allowed to chase
down suspected terrorists, according to former commandos and a
Defense Department official.
Iraq Police Fire on Demonstrators
BBC News, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: Former Iraqi soldiers have clashed with Iraqi police and UK
troops in an angry demonstration in the city of Basra. Several
people were wounded when police fired on the protesters, who were
demanding pensions they said had not been paid since September. The
protests showed a level of anger not usually seen in the relatively
calm city, which is controlled by UK forces.
Feeling Besieged, Iraq's Sunnis
Unite
Once-Dominant Minority Forms Council To Counter Shiites and
Negotiate Future
By Alan Sipress
Washington Post, 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: Iraq's minority Sunni Muslims, who enjoyed a favored place
under former president Saddam Hussein and now complain of
discrimination, have formed a national council to press their
interests with U.S. occupation forces and counter the threat of
domination by rival Shiite Muslims. ...the formation of the Sunni
council could also complicate U.S. plans for transition to Iraqi
sovereignty by July 1, because the Sunnis would be in a stronger
position to resist these efforts. The council, for instance, is
demanding that the next Iraqi government be selected by direct
election rather than through local caucuses, as U.S. officials
prefer.
Assad Given Weapons
Ultimatum
By Anton La Guardia
The Telegraph' 7 January 2004
EXCERPT: America and Britain rebuffed President Bashar Assad of
Syria yesterday, telling him bluntly that Damascus must give up its
weapons of mass destruction or face ostracism - even if neighbouring
Israel keeps its nuclear arms.
6 January 2004
North Korea Nuke Talks Remain in
Limbo
By HANS GREIME
AP, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: Talks on ending the North Korean nuclear crisis hung in
limbo Monday: North Korea blamed the impasse on Washington's demand
for disarmament, and South Korea and Russia said it was unlikely a
new round of six-nation negotiations could open this month.
British Airline Rejects Guns on
Flights
By Andrew Clark, Hugh Muir and
Rosie Cowan
Guardian (UK), 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: Britain's biggest holiday flight operator, Thomas Cook
Airlines, has become the first carrier to display open dissent to
the government's new security requirements by refusing to carry sky
marshals on flights to the US. The company, which operates 40
flights a week through US airspace, broke ranks over measures viewed
as draconian by many airlines and pilots. Thomas Cook said if it
were asked to carry armed marshals on any aircraft it would cancel
the flight. It operates regular charter flights from Britain to
Miami and Orlando in Florida, as well as services to Mexican and
Caribbean resorts which fly over US territory.
Trouble Looms After
Coalition Tells Kurds Self-Rule Can Stay
By Owen Bowcott and Brian Whitaker
Guardian (UK), 6 January 2004
EXCERPT: Kurdish political leaders have been reassured that their
region's semi-autonomous status will be allowed to continue after
the handover to Iraqi self-rule on June 30. The decision, which will
infuriate neighbouring states and antagonise other Iraqis, is likely
to have far-reaching consequences for any future constitutional
settlement.
5 January 2004
The Battle for Iraqi Oil
By Aram Roston
The Nation, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: David Horgan opposed the war on Iraq, but in other ways he
is an antiwar protester's worst nightmare: The oil executive freely
admits that he is in the bombed-out country "for greed and glory."
His goal is a mammoth oil deal for the small Irish company he works
for, Petrel Resources. Still, amid the shooting and kidnappings and
chaos, the wiry 43-year-old Irishman says he will be satisfied with
even crumbs. "A crumb in Iraq," he says eagerly, eyes widening,
"would be hundreds of millions of dollars at present value. It is
high risk, in every sense, but it is an excellent play." Horgan is
no newcomer to Iraq and to this particular "play." He dealt with the
administration of Saddam Hussein and he is willing to do business
with whoever comes next, even a US puppet, as he believes it will
be. "We'll deal with the puppet," he said one day at the Baghdad
Sheraton, as a group of Nepalese Gurkha warriors clomped past loaded
with body armor and rifles. "Any puppet will have exactly the same
objectives and worries. His first priority is to get the oil
flowing." That may sound cynical, but at least it sounds
honest--which is more, as Horgan points out, than the Bush
Administration can say about its justification for invading Iraq.
The Economics of Empire
By Walden Bello
New Labor Forum via ZNet, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Talks at the WTO's fifth Ministerial in Cancun collapsed,
and the organization is in gridlock. A massive obstacle to
restarting negotiations is the refusal of the United States and the
European Union (EU) to cut their massive subsidies in agriculture
and their insistence, against widespread resistance from developing
countries, on bringing non- trade issues such as investment and
government procurement into the ambit of the WTO. Meanwhile,
Washington and Brussels continue to be separated by a whole range of
issues, including the EU's moratorium on genetically modified foods.
Developing countries, some once hopeful that the WTO would in fact
bring more equity to global trade, unanimously agree that most of
what they have reaped from WTO membership are costs, not benefits.
What happened? In a word, Empire. It turns out that globalization
and U.S. unilteralism don't mix.
SEE ALSO:
The Imperial Gong Show Year
(AlterNet)
Kurdish Region in Northern Iraq
Will Get to Keep Special Status
By STEVEN R. WEISMAN
New York Times, 5 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Bush administration has decided to let the Kurdish
region remain semi-autonomous as part of a newly sovereign Iraq
despite warnings from Iraq's neighbors and many Iraqis not to divide
the country into ethnic states, American and Iraqi officials say.
The officials said their new position on the Kurdish area was
effectively dictated by the Nov. 15 accord with Iraqi leaders that
established June 30 as the target date for Iraqi self-rule. Such a
rapid timetable, they said, has left no time to change the autonomy
and unity of the Kurdish stronghold of the north, as many had
originally wanted. "Once we struck the Nov. 15 agreement, there was
a realization that it was best not to touch too heavily on the
status quo," said an administration official. "The big issue of
federalism in the Kurdish context will have to wait for the Iraqis
to resolve. For us to try to resolve it in a month or two is simply
too much to attempt." The issue of whether Iraq is to be divided
into ethnic states in a federation-style government is of great
significance both inside the country and throughout the Middle East,
where fears are widespread that dividing Iraq along ethnic or
sectarian lines could eventually break the country up and spread
turmoil in the region.
New Wars in Iraq: Making
Compromises to Keep a Country Whole
By EDWARD WONG
New York Times, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: As the countdown to the handover of power in Iraq enters
its final six months, American officials are focusing on how to
create a working democracy. They are trying to walk a fine line
between giving ethnic and religious groups the territory, resources
and autonomy they demand, and ensuring that such power does not give
rise to dangerous nationalisms. That prospect was evident last week
in northern Iraq, when clashes among Arabs, Kurds and Turkmen in
Kirkuk left at least five people dead. Arabs are trying to lay claim
to the oil-rich city, which Kurdish leaders say should be integrated
into a proposed autonomous Kurdish region. That corner of the
country seemed to be edging closer to more sweeping sectarian
conflict. To avoid this, some experts say, the American authorities
face the challenge of finding compromises: reallocating economic
resources, divvying up power between central and regional
governments and perhaps introducing a less familiar version of
democracy, one that, for example, limits participation by extremist
politicians campaigning on ethnic or religious differences. "By
breaking up the country, you're more likely to get radicalism," said
Stephen D. Krasner, a professor of political science at Stanford
University. "Iraq looks like a very artificial country, but there's
no evidence that breaking up countries makes them more democratic. I
think the basic rule has to be, you need institutional arrangements
that will make people want to stay with something that looks
reasonably democratic, reasonably secular, rather than go
elsewhere."
Distrust of U.S. Foils Effort to
Stop Crippling Disease Polio
By John Murphy
Baltimore Sun, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: A scourge of the mid-20th century eludes global eradication
and begins to spread as fearful Nigerians shun vaccination. ...They
(Nigerian villiagers) had heard a rumor circulating through the hot,
dusty villages of northern Nigeria that the vaccine had been
contaminated with an anti-fertility agent that would sterilize their
children or perhaps infect them with the AIDS virus, all part of an
American plot to depopulate the developing world. The villagers
believed it. ...No one quite knows how the rumors about the
vaccine's safety began, but local officials point to the northern
state of Kano, which has the highest number of polio cases in
Nigeria, as the likely source. ...As in much of the Muslim world,
anti-American passions run high among Kano's residents. In such a
climate, rumors of plots involving the polio vaccine found a
receptive audience.
Scott Ritter: The Search for Iraqi
WMD Has Become a Public Joke. But I Am Not Laughing
The Independent, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: The misrepresentation and distortion of fact carried out by
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair is no joke, but rather
represent an assault on the very fabric of the concept of a free and
democratic society which they espouse to serve. ...The damage done
goes well beyond the borders of the US and Britain. One must also
calculate the irreparable harm done to the precepts of international
law, the viability of multilateral organisations such as the United
Nations, and the concepts of diplomacy and arms control which kept
the world from destroying itself during the last century. Iran,
faced with 130,000 American soldiers on its border, has opened its
nuclear facilities to inspection. North Korea has done the same.
Libya, in a surprise move, has traded in its own overblown WMD
aspirations in exchange for diplomatic recognition and economic
interaction with the West. But none of these moves, as welcome as
they are, have the depth and reach to compare with the decision by
South Africa or the former republics of the Soviet Union to get rid
of their respective nuclear weapons. The latter represented actions
taken freely, wrapped in the principles of international law. The
former are merely coerced concessions, given more as a means of
buying time than through any spirit of true co-operation. Sold by
George Bush and Tony Blair as diplomatic triumphs derived from the
Iraq experience, the sad reality is that these steps towards
disarmament are every bit as illusory as Saddam's WMD arsenal. They
are all the more dangerous, too, because the safety net of
international law that the world could once have turned to when
these compelled concessions inevitably collapse no longer exists.
3-4 January 2004
What has Bush's special ally in the war on
terror been up to?
From Rogue Nuclear Programs,
Web of Trails Leads to Pakistan
By David E. Sanger and William J.
Broad
New York Times, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: President Bush, who regularly talks about nuclear dangers,
has never mentioned Pakistan's laboratories or their proliferation
in public ‹ probably out of concern of destabilizing President
Pervez Musharraf, who has survived two assassination attempts in
December. "He's been a stand-up guy when it comes to dealing with
the terrorists," Mr. Bush said of General Musharraf on Thursday. "We
are making progress against Al Qaeda because of his cooperation." He
dismissed a question about the vulnerability of Pakistan's own
nuclear weapons, saying, "Yes, they are secure," then changed the
subject. Yet when President Bush talks about the horrors that could
unfold if a nuclear weapon fell into the hands of terrorists, it is
Pakistan's combustible mix of expertise, components, fuel and fully
assembled weapons that springs to the minds of American and European
intelligence experts. In public, the White House says it has
received "assurances" from Pakistan that if there ever were nuclear
exports they are finished. "There is this almost empty-headed
recitation of assurances that whatever Pakistan did in the past it's
over, it's no longer a problem," said one senior European diplomat
with access to much of the intelligence about proliferation. "But
there's is no evidence that it has ever stopped."
SEE ALSO:
Bush Pledged $3 Billion to Pakistan Last June
(Guardian)
SEE ALSO:
Bush Hails Pakistan's Military Dictator
(BBC, June 2003)
SEE ALSO:
Bush Declares Pakistan America's Terror Ally
(TruthOut.org, August 2002)
U.S. Prepares for Risky Iraq Troop
Rotation
By Will Dunham
Reuters in WP, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Pentagon is gearing up for a massive rotation of about
a quarter million troops in and out of Iraq, a giant logistics chore
complicated by concerns about opportunistic attacks targeting
Americans as they arrive or depart. Between late January and May,
123,000 weary U.S. troops will be pulled out of Iraq and replaced
with about 110,000 fresh Army soldiers and Marines. In addition,
11,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan will be brought home and replaced
with about the same number.
British Airways Will Refuse to Fly
With Armed Guards
Juliette Jowit,
The Observer, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Controversial plans to put armed guards on British
passenger planes were in disarray last night after British Airways
effectively refused to fly with them aboard because it would mean
there was a 'significant threat' to passengers.
An internal BA memo obtained by The Observer makes clear that
executives are deep-seatedly opposed to the scheme unveiled by the
Government last week as a vital new step to protect aircraft against
hijackers.
Babies Who Threaten to Topple
Israel
A looming birthrate crisis could make Jews a minority in their
homeland within 20 years
Peter Beaumont
The Observer, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Avraham Burg, former Speaker of the Israeli parliament, has
been stirring up trouble. In August, he charged Israel with having
failed in its historic mission to be a 'light unto nations' through
its belligerence. He was promptly accused of encouraging 'the Jew
hatred sweeping all of Europe'.
A few weeks ago, Burg was at it again, articulating the nightmare
all Israelis fear: 'Between the Jordan [River] and the
Mediterranean, somewhere between next year and two years' time,
there will be born the first Palestinian ... of the Palestinian
majority,' - the generation of Arabs who will outnumber Israelis.
Now figures released last week show that immigration - to a country
beset by violence and a faltering economy - has collapsed to its
lowest level in 15 years, dramatically cutting the population
growth. This is the Achilles heel of the security policies of Ariel
Sharon and his Likud-led government. In three years, immigration has
fallen by half, despite Sharon's avowed aim to attract a million
immigrants in the next decade. According to Israel's state
statistics office, the population is now 6.75 million - 81 per cent
Jewish and 'other' nationalities' and 19 per cent Arab.
The New Cold War: US and
Russia Square Off Again
By Jonathan Steele
Guardian (UK), 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: In the dying weeks of another war-filled year, one bit of
good news was the non-violent uprising which toppled Eduard
Shevardnadze's regime in Georgia. But as the Caucasian republic goes
to the polls tomorrow to choose a successor, the risk of bloodshed
remains high and powerful external forces are trying to determine
how the new president behaves. Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say
that Georgia is the cockpit of a new cold war. During the Soviet
period the struggle between the US and Russia was on a global scale.
Massive arsenals were locked in stalemate in Europe, but wars
ravaged Africa and Asia as the superpowers found it easier to
compete there by interfering in local conflicts without the fear of
nuclear conflagration. These were the so-called proxy wars. The
USSR's collapse did not end the rivalry. It merely recast it on a
more complex stage which stressed deviousness rather than outright
hostility. Washington wooed post-communist Russia with offers of
partnership while expanding the old anti-Russian alliance, Nato, to
take in former Soviet allies as well as the three Baltic states.
SEE ALSO:
Georgia Tries to Lift Itself from Political
Turmoil
(Guardian)
Too little, too late...
Rebranding Bush as a Man of
Peace
Guardian (UK), 3 January 2004
EXCERPTS: The White House has retreated from its doctrine of regime
change and pre-emptive military action and is returning to
traditional diplomacy in an effort to repackage George Bush as a
president for peace.... Analysts in Washington say the Bush
administration has little choice if it is to fulfill a highly
ambitious election year agenda that seeks to disarm "rogue states"
such as North Korea while advancing towards a settlement between
Israel and the Palestinians, encouraging conflict resolution in
Sudan, and achieving credible transformations in Afghanistan and
Iraq. All these objectives are complicated and to some degree
hindered by the "war on terror" against a resurgent al-Qaida, and by
America's failure to capture or kill Osama bin Laden.
SEE ALSO:
US Soldiers Ransack Sunni Mosque
(Guardian)
Chomsky Interviewed About
Iraq
By Hawzheen O. Kareem
Komal Newspaper via ZNet, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: It remains a very high priority to control the Gulf
resources, which are expected to provide 2/3 of world energy needs
for some time to come. Quite apart from yielding "profits beyond the
dreams of avarice," as one leading history of the oil industry puts
the matter, the region still remains "a stupendous source of
strategic power," a lever of world control. Control over Gulf energy
reserves provides "veto power" over the actions of rivals, as the
leading planner George Kennan pointed out half a century ago.
Europe and Asia understand very well, and have long been seeking
independent access to energy resources. Much of the jockeying for
power in the Middle East and Central Asia has to do with these
issues. The populations of the region are regarded as incidental, as
long as they are passive and obedient. Few know this as well as the
Kurds, at least if they remember their own history.
US planners surely intend to establish a client state in Iraq, with
democratic forms if that is possible, if only for propaganda
purposes. But Iraq is to be what the British, when they ran the
region, called an "Arab facade," with British power in the
background if the country seeks too much independence. That is a
familiar part of the history of the region for the past century.
SEE ALSO:
Tension Between US and British Authorities
(Guardian)
Death Toll in Iraq
By REUTERS in NYT, 4 January 2004
Following is a summary of the deaths in the invasion of Iraq and
subsequent occupation. The military numbers were compiled by the
Pentagon. The Iraqi military data are unofficial; estimates of
civilian Iraqi deaths are by www .iraqbodycount.net.
FOREIGN TROOPS IN COMBAT AND ATTACKS
United States 328
Britain 20
Bulgaria 5
Other nations 27
NONCOMBAT
United States 153
Britain 32
Other nations 3
IRAQIS KILLED
Military 4,895 to 6,370
Civilians 7,960 to 9,792
A Deadly, Dispassionate Intensity
By ERIC SCHMITT
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The intimate horror of the guerrilla war here in Iraq seems
most vivid when seen through the sights of a sniper's rifle. In an
age of satellite-guided bombs dropped at featureless targets from
30,000 feet, Army snipers can see the expression on a man's face
when the bullet hits. "I shot one guy in the head, and his head
exploded," said Sgt. Randy Davis, one of about 40 snipers in the
Army's new 3,600-soldier Stryker Brigade, from Fort Lewis, Wash.
"Usually, though, you just see a dust cloud pop up off their
clothes, and see a little blood splatter come out the front."
Working in teams of two or three, Army snipers here in Iraq cloak
themselves in the shadows of empty city buildings or burrow into
desert sands with camouflage suits, waiting to fell guerrilla gunmen
and their leaders with a single shot from as far as half a mile
away.
Some Bulgarian Soldiers Refuse to
Go to Iraq
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE in NYT, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: More than two dozen Bulgarian soldiers have refused to join
a 500-member contingent heading for Iraq after attacks there in
which five Bulgarian soldiers died, the chief of staff of the
Bulgarian Army said Friday. "Between 25 and 30 soldiers have
declined duty, probably as a result of pressure from their
families," Gen. Nikola Kolev told Bulgarian radio.
|
Send
questions, comments, etc. to
 |
What has Bush's special ally in the war on
terror been up to?
From Rogue Nuclear Programs,
Web of Trails Leads to Pakistan
By David E. Sanger and William J.
Broad
New York Times, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: President Bush, who regularly talks about nuclear dangers,
has never mentioned Pakistan's laboratories or their proliferation
in public ‹ probably out of concern of destabilizing President
Pervez Musharraf, who has survived two assassination attempts in
December. "He's been a stand-up guy when it comes to dealing with
the terrorists," Mr. Bush said of General Musharraf on Thursday. "We
are making progress against Al Qaeda because of his cooperation." He
dismissed a question about the vulnerability of Pakistan's own
nuclear weapons, saying, "Yes, they are secure," then changed the
subject. Yet when President Bush talks about the horrors that could
unfold if a nuclear weapon fell into the hands of terrorists, it is
Pakistan's combustible mix of expertise, components, fuel and fully
assembled weapons that springs to the minds of American and European
intelligence experts. In public, the White House says it has
received "assurances" from Pakistan that if there ever were nuclear
exports they are finished. "There is this almost empty-headed
recitation of assurances that whatever Pakistan did in the past it's
over, it's no longer a problem," said one senior European diplomat
with access to much of the intelligence about proliferation. "But
there's is no evidence that it has ever stopped."
SEE ALSO:
Bush Pledged $3 Billion to Pakistan Last June
(Guardian)
SEE ALSO:
Bush Hails Pakistan's Military Dictator
(BBC, June 2003)
SEE ALSO:
Bush Declares Pakistan America's Terror Ally
(TruthOut.org, August 2002)
U.S. Prepares for Risky Iraq Troop
Rotation
By Will Dunham
Reuters in WP, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: The Pentagon is gearing up for a massive rotation of about
a quarter million troops in and out of Iraq, a giant logistics chore
complicated by concerns about opportunistic attacks targeting
Americans as they arrive or depart. Between late January and May,
123,000 weary U.S. troops will be pulled out of Iraq and replaced
with about 110,000 fresh Army soldiers and Marines. In addition,
11,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan will be brought home and replaced
with about the same number.
British Airways Will Refuse to Fly
With Armed Guards
Juliette Jowit,
The Observer, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Controversial plans to put armed guards on British
passenger planes were in disarray last night after British Airways
effectively refused to fly with them aboard because it would mean
there was a 'significant threat' to passengers.
An internal BA memo obtained by The Observer makes clear that
executives are deep-seatedly opposed to the scheme unveiled by the
Government last week as a vital new step to protect aircraft against
hijackers.
Babies Who Threaten to Topple
Israel
A looming birthrate crisis could make Jews a minority in their
homeland within 20 years
Peter Beaumont
The Observer, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: Avraham Burg, former Speaker of the Israeli parliament, has
been stirring up trouble. In August, he charged Israel with having
failed in its historic mission to be a 'light unto nations' through
its belligerence. He was promptly accused of encouraging 'the Jew
hatred sweeping all of Europe'.
A few weeks ago, Burg was at it again, articulating the nightmare
all Israelis fear: 'Between the Jordan [River] and the
Mediterranean, somewhere between next year and two years' time,
there will be born the first Palestinian ... of the Palestinian
majority,' - the generation of Arabs who will outnumber Israelis.
Now figures released last week show that immigration - to a country
beset by violence and a faltering economy - has collapsed to its
lowest level in 15 years, dramatically cutting the population
growth. This is the Achilles heel of the security policies of Ariel
Sharon and his Likud-led government. In three years, immigration has
fallen by half, despite Sharon's avowed aim to attract a million
immigrants in the next decade. According to Israel's state
statistics office, the population is now 6.75 million - 81 per cent
Jewish and 'other' nationalities' and 19 per cent Arab.
The New Cold War: US and
Russia Square Off Again
By Jonathan Steele
Guardian (UK), 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: In the dying weeks of another war-filled year, one bit of
good news was the non-violent uprising which toppled Eduard
Shevardnadze's regime in Georgia. But as the Caucasian republic goes
to the polls tomorrow to choose a successor, the risk of bloodshed
remains high and powerful external forces are trying to determine
how the new president behaves. Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say
that Georgia is the cockpit of a new cold war. During the Soviet
period the struggle between the US and Russia was on a global scale.
Massive arsenals were locked in stalemate in Europe, but wars
ravaged Africa and Asia as the superpowers found it easier to
compete there by interfering in local conflicts without the fear of
nuclear conflagration. These were the so-called proxy wars. The
USSR's collapse did not end the rivalry. It merely recast it on a
more complex stage which stressed deviousness rather than outright
hostility. Washington wooed post-communist Russia with offers of
partnership while expanding the old anti-Russian alliance, Nato, to
take in former Soviet allies as well as the three Baltic states.
SEE ALSO:
Georgia Tries to Lift Itself from Political
Turmoil
(Guardian)
Too little, too late...
Rebranding Bush as a Man of
Peace
Guardian (UK), 3 January 2004
EXCERPTS: The White House has retreated from its doctrine of regime
change and pre-emptive military action and is returning to
traditional diplomacy in an effort to repackage George Bush as a
president for peace.... Analysts in Washington say the Bush
administration has little choice if it is to fulfill a highly
ambitious election year agenda that seeks to disarm "rogue states"
such as North Korea while advancing towards a settlement between
Israel and the Palestinians, encouraging conflict resolution in
Sudan, and achieving credible transformations in Afghanistan and
Iraq. All these objectives are complicated and to some degree
hindered by the "war on terror" against a resurgent al-Qaida, and by
America's failure to capture or kill Osama bin Laden.
SEE ALSO:
US Soldiers Ransack Sunni Mosque
(Guardian)
Chomsky Interviewed About
Iraq
By Hawzheen O. Kareem
Komal Newspaper via ZNet, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: It remains a very high priority to control the Gulf
resources, which are expected to provide 2/3 of world energy needs
for some time to come. Quite apart from yielding "profits beyond the
dreams of avarice," as one leading history of the oil industry puts
the matter, the region still remains "a stupendous source of
strategic power," a lever of world control. Control over Gulf energy
reserves provides "veto power" over the actions of rivals, as the
leading planner George Kennan pointed out half a century ago.
Europe and Asia understand very well, and have long been seeking
independent access to energy resources. Much of the jockeying for
power in the Middle East and Central Asia has to do with these
issues. The populations of the region are regarded as incidental, as
long as they are passive and obedient. Few know this as well as the
Kurds, at least if they remember their own history.
US planners surely intend to establish a client state in Iraq, with
democratic forms if that is possible, if only for propaganda
purposes. But Iraq is to be what the British, when they ran the
region, called an "Arab facade," with British power in the
background if the country seeks too much independence. That is a
familiar part of the history of the region for the past century.
SEE ALSO:
Tension Between US and British Authorities
(Guardian)
Death Toll in Iraq
By REUTERS in NYT, 4 January 2004
Following is a summary of the deaths in the invasion of Iraq and
subsequent occupation. The military numbers were compiled by the
Pentagon. The Iraqi military data are unofficial; estimates of
civilian Iraqi deaths are by www .iraqbodycount.net.
FOREIGN TROOPS IN COMBAT AND ATTACKS
United States 328
Britain 20
Bulgaria 5
Other nations 27
NONCOMBAT
United States 153
Britain 32
Other nations 3
IRAQIS KILLED
Military 4,895 to 6,370
Civilians 7,960 to 9,792
A Deadly, Dispassionate Intensity
By ERIC SCHMITT
New York Times, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The intimate horror of the guerrilla war here in Iraq seems
most vivid when seen through the sights of a sniper's rifle. In an
age of satellite-guided bombs dropped at featureless targets from
30,000 feet, Army snipers can see the expression on a man's face
when the bullet hits. "I shot one guy in the head, and his head
exploded," said Sgt. Randy Davis, one of about 40 snipers in the
Army's new 3,600-soldier Stryker Brigade, from Fort Lewis, Wash.
"Usually, though, you just see a dust cloud pop up off their
clothes, and see a little blood splatter come out the front."
Working in teams of two or three, Army snipers here in Iraq cloak
themselves in the shadows of empty city buildings or burrow into
desert sands with camouflage suits, waiting to fell guerrilla gunmen
and their leaders with a single shot from as far as half a mile
away.
Some Bulgarian Soldiers Refuse to
Go to Iraq
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE in NYT, 4 January 2004
EXCERPT: More than two dozen Bulgarian soldiers have refused to join
a 500-member contingent heading for Iraq after attacks there in
which five Bulgarian soldiers died, the chief of staff of the
Bulgarian Army said Friday. "Between 25 and 30 soldiers have
declined duty, probably as a result of pressure from their
families," Gen. Nikola Kolev told Bulgarian radio.
2 January 2004
US to Hussein: WMD A-OK
By Robert Scheer
The Nation, 30 December 2003
EXCERPT: The work of the National Security Archive, a dogged
organization fighting for government transparency, has cast light on
the trove of documents that depict in damning detail how the United
States, working with US corporations including Bechtel, cynically
and secretly allied itself with Hussein's dictatorship. The evidence
undermines the unctuous moral superiority with which the current
American President, media and public now judge Hussein, a monster
the United States actively helped create. The documents make it
clear that were the trial of Hussein to be held by an impartial
world court, it would prove an embarrassing two-edged sword for the
White House, calling into question the motives of US foreign policy.
If there were a complete investigation into those who aided and
abetted Hussein's crimes against humanity, Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld and former Secretary of State George Shultz would
probably end up as material witnesses. It was Rumsfeld and Shultz
who told Hussein and his emissaries that US statements generally
condemning the use of chemical weapons would not interfere with
relations between secular Iraq and the Reagan Administration, which
took Iraq off the terrorist-nations list and embraced Hussein as a
bulwark against fundamentalist Iran. Ironically, the United States
supported Iraq when it possessed and used weapons of mass
destruction and invaded it when it didn't.
Bush Undermining Reliance on
Guard/Reserve Component of US Military
By Robert Burns
AP, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: Citizen soldiers of the Army National Guard and Army
Reserve are suffering an increasing share of American military
deaths in Iraq, according to Pentagon statistics. ..."It's one more
strain on the reserve" component of the military, said Michael
O'Hanlon, a defense analyst at the Brookings Institution, a private
think tank. "We are living a gamble to keep the reserve component
intact," he said, at a time when reservists are coping with the
double worries of being called to active duty for long periods and
facing grave dangers in Iraq. The nation's citizen soldiers play a
role in every major military operation because they offer skills and
resources that are not available in sufficient numbers in the
active-duty force. Military police, linguists and civil affairs
specialists are called upon frequently, for example. But reservists
in Iraq are also in direct combat roles, and their presence there is
about to expand. Of the approximately 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq
now, about a fourth are reservists.
Protect this...
Civilians May be Target of Choice for Iraqi Insurgents
By Matthew Rosenberg
The Associated Press, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: The New Year's Eve car bombing of an upscale Baghdad
restaurant, which killed eight people, was a sign that opponents of
the U.S.-led occupation forces may be shifting to civilian targets,
U.S. and Iraqi officials said Thursday. The "hard targets" in
Baghdad, like coalition complexes and Iraqi police stations, are
increasingly well guarded, pushing insurgents toward soft targets,
like the Nabil Restaurant, said a U.S. military officer with the 1st
Armored Division. He spoke on the condition of anonymity. "When
terrorists can target coalition forces or Iraqi police," they will,
said Lt. Gen. Ahmed Kadhem, deputy Iraqi interior minister and
Baghdad chief of police. "If they can't, they go to an easier
target, aiming at civilians." He said security is being increased
around hospitals and government buildings and called on schools to
put up checkpoints and keep cars off campuses.
A safe investment of American tax dollars?
Bush Administration Plans
Huge Embassy in Iraq
By Robin Wright
Washington Post, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: In preparation for ending its occupation of Iraq, the
United States is making plans to create the largest U.S. diplomatic
mission in the world in Baghdad, complete with a staff of over 3,000
personnel, according to U.S. officials.
SEE ALSO:
Iraq Car Blast Seen as Tactical Shift
(AP)
Afghan Model Unraveling?
By Amir Shah
The Associated Press, 2 January 2004
EXCERPT: Afghanistan's constitutional convention came off the rails
Thursday as panicked officials adjourned the gathering in the face
of a boycott by opponents of President Hamid Karzai. The delay was
the most severe setback yet to this war-ravaged nation's attempt to
put its vision of a secure future on paper, and it raises real
concern that the historic gathering will end in failure. Critics
blamed the government for its insistence on a strong presidency and
for its unwillingness to hear minority demands on such emotional
issues as language rights. Others point to the machinations of
warlords and faction leaders seeking a new niche if Karzai wins the
powers he is seeking. "There are several fundamentalists at work
here," said Mirwais Yasini, the loya jirga's deputy chairman. "The
jihadi groups all want a share of the power."
It was the oil...
Britain Says U.S. Planned to Seize Oil in '73 Crisis
By LIZETTE ALVAREZ
New York Times, 1 January 2004
EXCERPT: The United States government seriously contemplated using
military force to seize oil fields in the Middle East during the
Arab oil embargo 30 years ago, according to a declassified British
government document made public on Thursday. The top-secret document
says that President Richard M. Nixon was prepared to act more
aggressively than previously thought to secure America's oil supply
if the embargo, imposed by Arab nations in retaliation for America's
support for Israel in the 1973 Middle East war, did not end. In
fact, the embargo was lifted in March 1974. The declassified British
memorandum said the United States considered launching airborne
troops to seize oil fields in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Abu Dhabi,
but only as a "last resort." President Nixon's defense secretary,
James R. Schlesinger, delivered the warning to Lord Cromer, the
British ambassador in Washington at the time. In the document, Lord
Cromer was quoted as saying of Mr. Schlesinger, "it was no longer
obvious to him that the United States could not use force." The
seizure of the oil fields was "the possibility uppermost in American
thinking when they refer to the use of force," the memorandum said.
1 January 2004
AUDIO/VIDEO LINK
A Democracy Now! Review of
2003
With Noam Chomsky, John Pilger,
Katha Pollitt, Martin Espada, Michael Parenti and Aarti Shahani
Democracy Now!, 31 December 2003
EXCERPT: On the international front, as the Bush administration
expanded its occupation and war in Afghanistan, it intensified its
battle to sell a war against Iraq. The American public was bombarded
with stories of the grave danger posed by Saddam Hussein¹s alleged
weapons of mass destruction. Administration officials spoke of
mushroom clouds and smoking guns. In his January State of the Union
address, televised across the world, President Bush accused Iraq of
attempting to procure uranium for a nuclear weapons program, an
accusation that was the lynchpin of the administration¹s
justification for war. Though the administration was eventually
forced to retract the charge after former US ambassador to Iraq
Joseph Wilson blew the whistle , the damage was done.
(Other links inadvertently deleted.)
See previously selected articles in our
archives.
|